Cyclists Hub is supported by its readers. We may receive a commission if you buy products using our links.All content on Cyclists Hub is written by humans, not robots. Learn More
I have tested all cycling radars available on the market, including Garmin Varia RTL515, Magene L508, Bryton Gardia R300L, iGPSport SR30, and more.
Now, we have a new member: the Trek CarBack bike radar. So, what’s new? And will it be competitive with other radars? I bought it to conclude an in-depth review. I share my conclusions below.
KEY TAKEAWAY
Based on the specifications, the only major benefit of the Trek CarBack radar should be its longer detecting distance of 240m. The other radars usually have a range of around 150m. However, based on my experience and testing, CarBack struggles to detect them consistently so early. It underdelivers in the most important aspect.
I dislike the mount, which feels poorly designed and makes the radar hard to detach. On the other hand, CarBack gives almost no false positives, and its brightness is high. I also find the battery life indicator helpful. Feel free to buy CarBack here or continue reading for more info.
My CarBack rating at a glance:
Reliability 4/5 | Multi-object Detection 4/5 | Battery Life 3/5 | Brightness 5/5 | Side Visibility 1/5 | Mount 2/5 | App 3/5 | Price 3/5 | WEIGHTED OVERALL SCORE 3.2/5
More about this cycling radar scoring.
NOTE: I am probably the first person in the Czech Republic to test this radar.
Trek CarBack Specifications
Below, I summarized the technical specifications of the Trek CarBack radar.
Trek CarBack Bike Radar Specifications
- Dimensions: 70×50×25mm
- Weight: 87g
- Claimed battery life: 7-12 hours
- Real battery life: ~11.5 hours in flash mode
- Charging port: USB-C
- Connectivity: ANT+, Bluetooth
- Radar: Yes
- Taillight: Yes
- Brake sensing: No
- Auto standby: No
- Lumens: 5-90
- Light modes: Day flash, day steady, night flash, and night steady
- Water resistance: IPX7
- Detecting distance: 240m
- Detecting speed: 6 to 111 km/h (3.7 to 69 mph)
- Viewing angle: 270°
- Horizontal angle: 35°
- Protocols: ANT+, Bluetooth
Also available at trekbikes.com
Trek CarBack Pros and Cons
Trek CarBack Pros
- Increased sense of safety
- Battery life indicator
- No false negatives, low number of false positives
- Excellent brightness
- Good battery life
- The mount doesn’t slide on the seatpost
- The real battery life almost meets claimed battery life
- USB-C charging port
Trek CarBack Cons
- High price
- Questionable detection distance (I still test this one)
- Too wide (causing more drag than other radars)
- Too basic CarBack app
- Line detection is ‘cool’ but basically useless
- The mount feels cheap and is proprietary
- Occasional issues with turning the radar off
- The light doesn’t change the light pattern when overtaking
- No side visibility
Form Factor
Trek CarBack is much wider than other radars on the market. It was probably not designed with aerodynamics in mind. I guess it is targeted at more casual cyclists because it causes more drag (as it’s not hidden behind the seatpost, but its sides exceed it), which can cost precious watts.






I would also expect a much longer battery life than the claimed 7-12 hours. You learn more about how long CarBack lasted in the Battery Life section.
I like the battery level indicator on its side, but I am sure the LEDs (paradoxically) cause unnecessary battery drain.

Package Contents and Setup
The CarBack comes with a universal mount, USB-C charging cable, and manual.

Pairing the radar with my Magene C606 bike computer was flawless. It has ANT+ and Bluetooth connectivity. Like most other sensors, it uses ANT+ to connect to bike computers and Bluetooth to connect with smartphones.
Mount: The Biggest Weakness?
The mount provides a solid fit and does not slip on rounded or aero seatposts. But it feels poorly made. The end of the rubber is secured with a rubber ring, but this solution doesn’t quite work, so the end of the strap flaps. Additionally, the mount socket is proprietary, and removing the radar requires two hands. It also allows radar to be mounted from one side only.




Detecting Distance and Accuracy
The longer vehicle detection distance of 240m, which should be CarBack’s killer feature, is not a deal breaker for me. For comparison, other radars range between 140-190m. The most important thing for me is the radar’s reliability.
Based on my first impressions, the radar detection is very inconsistent. This means that it sometimes detects them from a long distance (usually slow-riding cars/trucks), but sometimes, it struggles and detects them at the last possible moment (<50m). This usually applies to fast-driving cars. In most scenarios, however, it detects the cars at about the same time as Garmin Varia RTL515.
I will keep testing this for more accurate results and update this section accordingly. So, stay tuned.
Line Detection
CarBack is the first radar on the market that can also detect lanes. This feature is only available on the Trek Accessories smartphone app and does not work on bike computers. Personally, I doubt its usefulness because I don’t know many people who use a smartphone instead of a bike computer, and I simply don’t see the added value. However, from a technology standpoint, it is probably an interesting development.

I’ve tried the feature, and in most cases, it works by showing the vehicle in the middle, then in the pass zone, and then again in the middle after passing where you are not in danger. With all other radars, I automatically assume that any vehicle passing me is a potential hazard. I don’t need an app to tell me that.
Battery Life
The claimed battery life of CarBack ranges between 7 and 12 hours, depending on the light mode used. I always test radars in day flash mode. The real battery life almost met the claimed one. My CarBack with radar on lasted ~11.5 hours, and then another hour with the taillight on and radar off.
Unlike other radars, CarBack will turn off the radar when the battery drops below 5%, but the rear light will continue to flash. So don’t rely on the radar when the battery is too low!
Other Issues with CarBack
The CarBack disappointed me even more by failing to turn off using the physical button a few times or by failing to switch the light modes. I noticed this was only the case when paired with the Garmin Edge 840. Surprisingly, the radar did not turn off, even holding the button for more than 30 seconds (which is normally enough for a “hard reset”). I was only able to turn it off when I turned off the bike computer. I managed to capture this failure on video, which will be in a video review I’m preparing.
Finally, although it has excellent brightness, the light does not change the flashing pattern when you are overtaken to alert the driver. This is another disappointment as it is one of the most useful features that radar tail lights have.
Price
The price is the same as the Garmin Varia RTL515. CarBack costs $199 (£169.99 | €199.99 | AU$299). So, I’m wondering what is the main reason for choosing this radar over cheaper but similarly capable (and more consistent) competitors such as Magene, Bryton, or iGPSport radars.
Based on my first impressions, I expected much more from CarBack. Despite the micro USB charging port, I would recommend Varia RTL515.
Trek CarBack vs. The Competition
The following table compares Trek CarBack with other bicycle radars, like Garmin Varia RTL515, Bryton Gardia R300L, Magene L508, and iGPSport SR30.
Feature | Garmin Varia RTL515 | Magene L508 | Bryton Gardia R300L | iGPSport SRTL SR30 | Trek CarBack | Cycplus L7 | Wahoo TRACKR Radar |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | 98.6×19.7×39.6 mm 3.9×0.8×1.6 in | 94×38×25 mm 3.7×1.5×0.98 in | 97×20.9×40 mm 3.82×0.82×1.57 in | 99×20.3×39.7 mm 3.9×0.79×1.56 in | 70×50×30 mm 2.76×1.97×1.18 in | 76.5×37×25 mm 3×1.46×0.98 in | 90×82×42 mm 3.54×3.23×1.65 in |
Weight | 71g | 65g | 66g | 68.8g | 70g | 67g | 99g |
Claimed battery life | Up to 16 hours (flash mode) | Up to 18 hours (flash mode) | Up to 17 hours (flash mode) | Up to 18 hours (flash mode) | Up to 7 hours | Up to 25 hours (flash mode) | Up to 20 hours (low flash mode) |
Real battery life | 9 hours and 30 minutes in the day flash mode¹ | 7 hours and 20 minutes in the flash mode | 11 hours and 40 minutes in the day flash mode² | 16 hours and 55 minutes in the flash mode | 11 hours and 21 minutes in the flash mode | 15 hours and 15 minutes in the flash mode | n/a |
Charging | MicroUSB | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C |
Radar | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Taillight | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Brake sensing | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
Auto stand-by | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | n/a | Yes | Yes |
Lumens | Up to 65 | Up to 40 | Up to 73 | Up to 65 | Up to 90 | n/a | Up to 53 |
Light modes | Solid, peloton, night flash, day flash | Solid, peloton, flash, pulse, rotation, quick flash, radar only | High/low solid, group ride (peloton), flash, radar only | Constant (solid), fleet, breathing, day flash, night flash, radar only | Day flash, day steady, night steady, night flash | Steady, flashing, breathing, radar only | High and low steady/flashing |
Customizable light modes | No | Yes³ | No | No | No | Yes | No |
Detecting distance | Up to 140m | Up to 140m | Up to 190m | Up to 150m | Up to 230m⁴ | Up to 160m | Up to 150m |
Relative detecting speed | 10 to 160 km/h (6 to 99 mph) | 10 to 120 km/h (6 to 74 mph) | 10 to 120 km/h (6 to 74 mph) | 10 to 120 km/h (6 to 74 mph) | n/a | 10 to 160 km/h (6 to 99 mph) | n/a |
Water resistance | IPX7 | IPX7 | IPX7 | IPX7 | IPX7 | IPX6 | IPX7 |
Viewing angle | 220° | 220° | 220° | 220° | n/a | 270° | n/a |
Horizontal detection angle | 40° | 40° | 40° | 40° | n/a | 40° | 35° |
Protocols | Bluetooth, ANT+ | Bluetooth, ANT+ | Bluetooth, ANT+ | Bluetooth, ANT+ | Bluetooth, ANT+ | Bluetooth, ANT+ | Bluetooth, ANT+ |
More info | RTL515 review | L508 review | R300 review | SR30 review | CarBack review | n/a | Coming soon |
Buy | Check Price Check Price (rei.com) | Check Price | Check Price | Check Price | Check Price Check Price (trekbikes.com) | Check Price | Available soon |
¹About two years old unit. The battery depreciation probably influenced the battery life.
²Demo unit – I am not sure if this influenced the battery life.
³Paid subscription or free for email subscription.
⁴Early reviews suggest the real detecting distance is around 150m, which means more or less the same as other radars.
Updated: May 27, 2025
Conclusion
My first impressions of the Trek CarBack are mixed. I am more disappointed than excited. Its detection is inconsistent. That is, it detects some cars from around 200m away, while some cars at the last possible moment (50m or less). So far, Trek hasn’t been able to live up to its bold claims, and given the high price of the radar, I’d rather recommend the Garmin Varia RTL515. However, there is a chance that Trek is working on a new firmware update that could improve accuracy.
Another weakness of this radar is the mount, which appears to be poorly designed and has a proprietary socket. The form factor is also not the best for the discerning road user due to the less aerodynamic shape (the CarBack really doesn’t look good on road bikes).
The CarBack has excellent brightness, but unfortunately does not change the light pattern when someone overtakes you. Its battery life indicator is a nice plus.
What do you think of the new radar? Let me know in the comments.
Also available at trekbikes.com
I appreciate the practical advice you’ve given here.
Thanks, John. 🙂
Line Detection is a great feature that I miss in Varia. When you ride on a multilane road, you constantly see cars behind you on the computer, but 90% of them are in other lanes (especially when you ride in a bus lane). So it’s always a surprise when a car passes close to you. If you only ride on country roads, then yes, it would be useless. The lack of support for this feature on bike computers is what has stopped me from buying one so far.
Thanks for your insight, Andy.
– Petr