Cyclists Hub is supported by its readers. We may receive a commission if you buy products using our links.
All content on Cyclists Hub is written by humans, not robots. Learn More
Winspace introduced several new road bike frames in the last two years, and their offer started to be a bit confusing. So, in this article, I will review Winspace road bike frames (SLC3.0, T1550 Gen 2, T1600, C5 Aero, and Agile) and help you decide which one to choose.
Winspace Road Bike Frames Compared
The following table summarizes the specifications of all Winspace road bike frames. Below, I explain individual frames in depth.
| Frame | SLC3.0 | SLC5.0 | T1550 Gen 2 | T1600 | Agile | C5 | C5 Aero | SLC2.0 | T1550 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Lightweight | Lightweight | Aero | Aero | All-rounder | All-rounder | Aero | Lightweight | Aero |
| Weight¹ | 699g (±35g) | 705g (±35g) | 800g (±35g) | 900g (±35g) | 850g (±35g) | 1010g (±30g) | 900g (±30g) | 780g (±35g) | 880g (±35g) |
| Bottom bracket | BB86 | BSA-68 | T47-85.5 | T47-85.5 | T47-85.5 | BB86 | T47 | BB86 | BB86 |
| Max tire width | 32mm | 32mm | 32mm | 32mm | 32mm | 32mm | 32mm | 25mm | 28mm |
| Material | T1100 + T1000 + M46 + M65 | T1100 + T1000 + M46 + M65 | T800 and T1000 | T800 + T1000 + T1100 + Kevlar Fiber | T800 and T1000 | T800 | T800 + M series high modulus carbon | T700 and T800 | T800 |
| Available sizes | 49, 52, 54, 56, 59cm | 44, 46, 48, 51, 54cm | 44, 47, 49, 52, 55cm | 44, 47, 49, 51, 54cm | 41, 44, 47, 51, 55cm | 43.5, 46.5, 48.5, 51.5, 53.5cm | 43.5, 46.5, 48.5, 51.5, 53.5cm | 49, 52, 54, 56, 59cm | 41, 44, 47, 51, 55cm |
| Disc/rim brake version | ✅ / ❌ | ✅ / ❌ | ✅ / ❌ | ✅ / ❌ | ✅ / ❌ | ✅ / ❌ | ✅ / ❌ | ✅ / ✅ | ✅ / ✅ |
| UCI-approved | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | n/a | ❌ | ✅ |
| In-depth Review | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | Read More | n/a | n/a | Read More | n/a |
| Buy | Check Price | n/a | Check Price | Check Price | Check Price | Check Price | Check Price | Check Price | Check Price |
¹M-size, Unpainted
Updated: Jul 3, 2025.
Winspace SLC3.0
The Winspace SLC3.0 is a purebred climbing bike frame weighing only 699g (unpainted, size M). It is made of T1100 + T1000 + M46 + M65 carbon, and its design is reminiscent of older road bikes. Surprisingly, it uses a rounded seatpost, which is less and less common these days.
The SLC3 is a great improvement over the SLC2, which was, by the way, also available for rim brakes. It is UCI-approved, and for me, it’s one of the “dream bikes” for a lightweight bike build.
Use this Winspace discount code CYCLISTSHUB10 at winspace.cc or lunwheels.cc during checkout to get 10% OFF your purchase. Share this code via email.
Winspace SLC5.0
The Winspace SLC5.0 is a lightweight all-rounder. Its weight is a question mark because at Eurobike, the specifications label stated 70g, while in an Instagram post, Winspace stated 900g. It its made of T1100 + T1000 + M46 + M65 carbon, and the rear-end design was pretty heavily inspired by the Specialized SL8. SLC5 was tested in the Silverstone wind tunnel and also takes some features from the T1600, such as the sharper head tube.
I’m looking forward to seeing the results of the wind tunnel testing and also the ride qualities. The frame looked great in person when I was checking it out at Eurobike 2025.
Winspace Agile
Winspace Agile balances lightness and agility. It’s made from Toray T800 and T1000 carbon fiber. It’s an all-rounder frame. I love its curved top tube and its T-tail seat stays. It’s an elegant design.
I started riding it in 2024 and can tell you it looks better in person than in the pictures. It’s a shame that the blue transition continues to green. I don’t think it was a wise choice. However, the internals look smooth and clean (see the pictures below). The details also look better than those on a Factor frame, which I checked in detail in one store.
Agile can accommodate tire sizes of up to 32mm, which is pretty much standard on today’s road bikes. Its sealed thru-axle design makes the entire bike look cleaner. Winspace claims it should improve aerodynamics, but we are talking marginal gains here.
Agile has a more aggressive geometry than C5 and a threaded T47 bottom bracket. Unfortunately, the frameset does not include an integrated handlebar, so you must buy one separately.
You can watch the following video for more info.
Use this Winspace discount code CYCLISTSHUB10 at winspace.cc or lunwheels.cc during checkout to get 10% OFF your purchase. Share this code via email.
… or read my Winspace Agile review.
By the way, here are a few pictures from inside the Agile frame. The bottom bracket area was clean and smooth. Everything else, except one part in the seat tube (where the seatstays connect), which was pretty rough, looked ok.
Winspace T1550 2nd Gen
The Winspace T1550 2nd Gen is the upcoming generation of the T1550, which is the successor to the T1500. It is a pure aero road frame, and it was Winspace’s flagship for a long time. It’s also the first Chinese frameset to appear in the Women’s Grand Tour (Vuelta Feminina 2024).
Like the Agile and C5, the T1550 uses a T-tail design. The through-axles are also sealed. The frame is made using the EPS+Latex molding technology from T800 and T1000 carbon. It has an aggressive geometry and is UCI-approved.
Use this Winspace discount code CYCLISTSHUB10 at winspace.cc or lunwheels.cc during checkout to get 10% OFF your purchase. Share this code via email.
Winspace T1600
The T1600 is the most eye-catching Winspace frame thanks to its “D-type” intake and “jet-inspired” headtube. It should be 5.5W faster than T1550 Gen 2 at 48 kph. I was the first person on the English internet to inform about it (see Winspace Launches T1600 Aero Frame article or watch the video below), and it started an avalanche.
Winspace claims the D-type intake should improve airflow and stability. They also claim it “generates more downforce when it counts”. Well, I don’t think we should play the “downforce” card in the cycling industry, but I would be curious to try this frame.
Other interesting features include the integrated cockpit, thin headtube, and seatpost. They tried to minimize the frontal area, and the T1600 seems pretty aggressive thanks to its sharp leading edges. The frame is also made from the T800, T1000, T1100, and Kevlar Fiber. These are advanced materials, so they are also reflected in the price. Anyway, T1600 definitely stands out from the crowd. How do you like it?
Use this Winspace discount code CYCLISTSHUB10 at winspace.cc or lunwheels.cc during checkout to get 10% OFF your purchase. Share this code via email.
Winspace C5
The Winspace C5 is the most affordable frame. However, it uses several features similar to Agile, such as the twisted t-tail, sealed axle design, or 32mm tire clearance.
The lower price comes from the lower carbon range (T800) and less aero-optimized design. However, I wouldn’t take that as a disadvantage on an endurance-tuned road bike. A standard handlebar will give you flexibility in tuning your riding position.
Use this Winspace discount code CYCLISTSHUB10 at winspace.cc or lunwheels.cc during checkout to get 10% OFF your purchase. Share this code via email.
Winspace C5 Aero
The Winspace C5 Aero is the heavily redesigned version of the C5. Winspace made an aero bike from it. Surprisingly, it’s 100g lighter despite beefier tubing.
Winspace also transitioned from BB86 to a T47 bottom bracket on this bike. I like the T47 for its ease of installation, but it is a bit heavier. I’m very curious whether this frame will cannibalize the sales of the T1550 2nd Gen because, except for weight and design, there are not many differences between them.
Use this Winspace discount code CYCLISTSHUB10 at winspace.cc or lunwheels.cc during checkout to get 10% OFF your purchase. Share this code via email.
Conclusion
I like the SLC3.0 as a pure-climber machine. It resembles a traditional climbing bike with modern touches (sealed axles, dropped seatstays). It’s my second-favorite Winspace frame. My favorite is Agile, but I’m biased because I own it. I find it comfortable and “agile”. You can read my Winspace Agile review for more details.
The T1550 2nd Gen is suitable for those looking for a stiff, aerodynamic frame. I am not the biggest fan of it design-wise, but it has gathered many positive reviews. The latest generation of the aero frame, the T1600, introduces new features like the D-shape intake, making the frame stand out from the crowd. It should also improve ride qualities and aerodynamics. It’s a pretty controversial frame, but I appreciate that Winspace tried something new, and I would love to try it. What about you?
The biggest question mark for me is the C5 and C5 Aero frames. Despite the same name, only the geometry is the same. Everything else was redesigned, mainly the tube shaping. Thanks to their lower price, they will appeal to more budget-conscious cyclists.
Let me know in the comments below which Winspace frame is your favorite, eventually, if you have experience with them. And if you enjoy talking about Chinese carbon, please join my Facebook group.
Use this Winspace discount code CYCLISTSHUB10 at winspace.cc or lunwheels.cc during checkout to get 10% OFF your purchase. Share this code via email.
Keen to see what the C5 is like, I’m in the market for an endurance road bike, hope this is more endurance than race geometry.
Hi Steve,
Yes. It should be. I am surprised they didn’t launch them at the same time. 🤷♂️
– Petr
There is precious little content online about the C5, compared to the Agile. I want something more endurance focused and am really interested what compromises Winspace have made for the C5.
I don’t know if I will be able to test the C5, but I work on an Agile build. Can’t wait to ride it. 🙂
– Petr
Look at the wheelbase. It’s about 5cm longer for the C5. There’s your answer right there. More relaxed geometry, longer wheelbase.
I’m torn between the Agile and the SLC 3.0. I have an SLC 2.0, but I’m no lightweight, weighing in at 79 kg at 1.69 cm. Comfort wise, I can always put a Cane Creek eeSilk seatpost (which I use on my SLC 2.0), so I’m not sure which is more comfortable (SLC 3.0 with eeSilk seatpost, or Agile with it’s own seatpost plus whatever geometry “magic” it has for longer rides). I do like the way the SLC 3.0 looks (classic lines), and I just prefer white (SLC 3.0 in white is $1,780 vs other colors and Agile, at $1,980) – but the $200 isn’t a factor at all.
I’ve been trying to look for a head-to-head of Agile vs SLC 3.0, but can’t find any. 🙂
And even this updated post still hasn’t made my decision easier: SLC 3.0 or Agile.
Hi Alfred
I’m biased because I’ve tried Agile but not SLC 3.0. I would say that it mainly depends on the terrain you ride the most often and your riding style. If you live in the mountains or like quick accelerations, SLC 3.0 is the way to go. Otherwise, Agile seems like a better all-rounder.
Regarding the seatpost, I don’t know how well the Cane Creek works, but Agile feels comfortable compared to YOELEO R12. It’s possible that it’s not that comfortable compared to other bikes. Unfortunately, I have not ridden so many bikes yet. I recommend you watch my Agile review where I try to demonstrate the seatpost and rear triangle flex.
Let me know if you have any questions and remember you can use the CYCLISTSHUB10 discount code for 10 % off. 🙂
– Petr
I have watched your review, and it’s great!
Actually, there’s another contender in my shortlist of bikes – the C5 Aero!
Maybe I should just close my eyes and use a dart board to choose one. 🤣
Thank you!
Haha, yeah 😀 it would make the decision process much easier. 😅 What is the terrain you ride the most often?
Mostly rolling. We do love climbs, and try to have it on every ride, but that makes up like only 5% of every ride (say, 60km ride, and lots of flat and rolling, and maybe only a 3km climb). While it might not make sense to get a super light climbing (ahem, SLC), it’s really nice to have a light nimble bike beneath me – yeah, more than the climbing prowess, nice feeling to have a light bike il underneath you.
The C5 Aero, however, is looking nice as an all day (ie, 100-200km Audax) bike.
I understand. The C5 Aero looks too bulky for my taste. The SLC3.0 is a pure climbing bike and the Agile is a great compromise between the two 😀 When you decide, please let me know which one you bought.
– Petr
Ordered the SLC 3.0 (used your code, too! Thank you for your code!). It should get here (Philippines) in a month, but still have to wait for wheels and other parts – so looks like it will be at least two to three months before it’s on the road (which is okay, because I still have my SLC 2.0 to use anyway).
BTW, I think the Agile (more all around bike) is probably the better fit for me, but I just love the more classic looks of the SLC 3.0. And the round seatpost. So, it wasn’t a purely logical choice, but more like a choice of passion, or what looks more exciting for me.
But in cycling, sometimes it’s the passion you have to follow for more enjoyment of our sport. 🙂
Awesome, good choice! You described it perfectly, sometimes, passion/emotions simply overweight logic and that’s absolutely fine. 🙂
Thanks for using my code, I appreciate it, Alfred. I can’t wait to reading your experience.
Maybe it’s my taste, but the rount tube on the SLC 3.0 (mainly the downtube) look almost too thin for my liking. I prefer a bit bigger tubes.
I’m thinking about getting and Agile or the T1550 gen 2 instead.
Hi Kassian,
I’m biased towards the Agile, but that’s mainly because I haven’t tried the T1550 Gen 2 or SLC 3.0 yet. 😃 For me, looks matter a lot, and I tend to prefer slightly thinner tubes (I am a pretty lean person), which is why I’m not a huge fan of most aero bikes. The Agile feels like a nice compromise. If it were a bit lighter, it would be absolutely perfect. Considering the frame tubing, I’d expect the Agile to be more comfortable and less stiff than the T1550.
– Petr
The tubes on the SLC3 while not aero are not round, but oblong. I think people imagine the tubing to be Aethos like in them being round, but again they aren’t
I had the T1500 and T1550 1st gen and now the SLC3, but never the Agile. I think now with the T1550 2nd gen and SLC3 the Agile is a bit redundant, since the T1550 2nd gen is lighter than the Agile and has relaxed it’s geometry slightly. Also the EPS mold design of the T1550 2nd gen should alleviate the bone rattling backend found on the T1500/T1550 1st gen since that rear triangle was bonded. The SLC3, is the lightest yet and is more akin to an all around lightweight bike in a Giant TCR, Cervelo Soloist, or Canyon Ultimate. Besides handling and differentiating aesthetics I am not sure what the Agile truly brings to the table that the T1550 2nd gen or SLC3 can’t fill.
I really enjoy my SLC3, but I have to say it’s one of the most poorly marketed bikes. They call it an endurance bike but the geometry is still very race like and is very close to a Giant Propel or Cannondale SuperSix. They say it’s an all terrain bike but it just has the industry standard 32mm tire clearance, so nothing all road let alone faux gravel. Maybe they meant all terrain in, mountain climbs and city flats? They briefly remarked that it has 80% of the aero efficiency of the T1550 but don’t clarify if that’s 1st gen or 2nd gen or give any kind of white paper on the wind tunnel testing. The Specialized SL 8 benchmarking is also very odd. Upon release I asked Patrick Lino and Grant from GCPerformance why in their video they referenced the SL 8 and basically they responded that Winspace in their marketing to them kept name dropping the Tarmac. I think David Arthur’s video titled, “Cancel your Specialized Tarmac SL8 Order?!” really had people thinking this was just Winspace’s take on the Tarmac, but when you watch the video the bike came with shallow Hyper 3 D33 and David never really compares the bike directly to a Tarmac, but more compares it to a TCR or even a niche Wilier Verticale. Either way I can say through my own experience the SLC3 is not a Specialized Aethos but on the other hand it’s not all around lightweight aero bike either, but it’s more of your traditional lightweight race bike similar to the TCR, Ultimate, Soloist, and so on. If you understand that, then yeah your expectations should be met.
On another note, I just think the colorways on the Agile suck. The only decent colorway is the white scheme and I wouldn’t say that’s a dynamic look. I just find the tri color faded color schemes to be cheesy and cheap looking. On the other hand there are 3-4 colorways on the T1550 gen 2 that are awesome and while the Superlight Black is boring it’s the most subtle in Winspace branding and is the lightest colorway, plus I really do like the Venom colorway
Thanks for your comprehensive comment. For me, Agile has it’s place, exactly for the reasons you mentioned. I’m not sure about the SL8 benchmarking, but maybe it was the best comparison to put the frame into a context and grab more attention.
Yeah, I agree with you about the color schemes. This is one of the areas Winspace really struggles with, imo.
– Petr
@JRasero thank you for this.
Hi Petr,
Thank you very much for the great content you provide. I really enjoy reading your articles.
I would appreciate your perspective on choosing my next bike.
I am 67kg/180cm 53 years old. Bike size 56 (I guess similar to you).
I ride often (4-5 times/week) but usually not very long rides. Average I would say around 2 hours. When I have time I go for longer rides.
The every day rides are usually hilly. In the weekends I go for climbing tours but the climbs around here are not the Alps…
I think I am naturally a climber but because of the type of rides I do more often I am currently a better puncheur.
I am looking at the Winspace lineup and I like pretty much all of them: Agile, C5 Aero, SLC3 and T1550 2nd gen.
I am still a little confused about differences, especially because what is claimed on the winspace website is often in contrast with reviews I read around, including yours and also some very good comments from other users on this page.
For example, the C5 aero is advertised as endurance, but it is clear it is not.
Some comments below mention that the Agile and T1550 are redundant while Winspace says one is an all rounder and the other a purely race frame.
So I am really confused.
What I think I am really looking for is a sporty all rounder with not too extreme geometry.
If I had to look for a “western” bike I guess something like a Cannondale Supersix.
Could you kindly help me to shed a light on the confusion I have right now?
Thank you!
PS I was also looking at the Yoeleo R12 which I think would fit my need in theory, but it seems not as good at Winspace in terms of quality…
Hi Guido,
Thank you, I appreciate it!
I would say go for the Agile or SLC3. I think that those could suit your riding style the most. Aero or chunky bikes don’t complement our skinny bodies. 😀
The term “endurance” should refer to the geometry. But the truth is that C5 Aero, while not being too aggressive, has not as relaxed geometry as a Canyon Endurance, for example.
Agile and T1550 are not redundant, imo. T1550 is a race aero frame, while Agile is an all-rounder.
The R12 is like a tank. It will handle everything you throw at it, but it’s not very comfortable due to the stiff rear-end.
I hope this helps.
– Petr
Hi Petr,
thank you for the reply.
A while back I had asked directly to Winspace the difference Agile vs C5 Aero and asked also to clarify confusion about geometry etc. etc.
Finally yesterday they replied.
“For endurance or long-distance events, the C5 aero would be the better choice, balancing performance with a smoother ride.
Agile is more agile and suitable for professional racing drivers.”
If I read this I am a little discouraged from buying an Agile. I am good rider, but far from being a pro (besides being 54 years old).
You have been riding the Agile for a while and also have been in contact with Winspace (I guess).
What is your take on this message I got back?
Thank you
Best,
Guido
Their reply doesn’t make any sense to me. How can the beefier tubing provide a smoother ride? I’ve been talking with a guy who sells Winspace and we agreed that Agile is one of the most underrated bikes from the lineup. I love Agile’s appearance much more than C5 Aero. I can’t comment C5A’s ride experience, but I can’t complain about Agile. 🙂
Hi Petr, Is it possible that the C5 Aero is more endurance-oriented because it uses a different type of carbon? Perhaps the fibers are bonded differently in certain places. Perhaps the frame’s appearance doesn’t reveal its properties. That’s my humble guess. I’m also interested in an endurance bike. The mix of aero and endurance would, of course, be perfect. Best regards, Henning
Hm… Hard to say without riding the frame. If you want comfy bike, get Agile. 🙂