Cyclists Hub is supported by its readers. We may receive a commission if you buy products using our links.
All content on Cyclists Hub is written by humans, not robots. Learn More
This is my ThinkRider X7 PRO smart trainer review. I saw this trainer on one of the local online marketplaces and decided to find out more about it because there are not many helpful reviews out there.
When researching ThinkRider trainers, I found GPLama’s review of the X5-Neo. He revealed serious accuracy issues. So, did ThinkRider’s highest-end smart trainer, X7 PRO, end better?
KEY TAKEAWAY
Based on multiple tests I performed, X7 PRO measured average power relatively accurately. However, it spiked in the minimum and maximum power.
Additionally, despite claiming up to 20 % gradient simulation on the box, gradients above 12 % didn’t feel much more difficult. So, some of the stated specifications do not correspond to reality.
On the other hand, the 5° side-to-side tilt is nice because it increases ride comfort. The X7 PRO’s portability is also good. You can buy it here or continue reading to find out more.
My X7 PRO rating at a glance:
Resistance & Gradient 2/5 | Accuracy 3/5 | Noisiness 5/5 | Power Consumption 4/5 | Ride Feel 3/5 | ERG Mode 3/5 | Ease of Setup 4/5 | Portability 5/5 | OVERALL 3.6/5
More about this bike trainer scoring.
Who Is ThinkRider X7 PRO for?
The ThinkRider X7 PRO is ideal for riders looking for a direct-drive smart trainer that doesn’t exceed the $1000 mark.
It offers all the features you expect from a smart trainer, including gradient simulation, connectivity with 3rd party apps, or ERG mode.
Its up to 5° side-to-side tilt makes it more comfortable than rigid trainers. It also has a rubber carry handle and foldable legs for easy portability.
ThinkRider X7 PRO Summary
Here is the summary of the main features and the technical specifications of the ThinkRider X7 PRO.
Main Features
- Up to 5° side-to-side tilt
- Highly responsive but inaccurate
- Portable thanks to the foldable legs and carry handle
- Adjustable legs
- USB ANT+ receiver included
- The cassette is not included
Technical Specification
- Maximum resistance: 2000W*
- Accuracy: ±2%
- Measured Accuracy: ±2.5% (learn more)
- Gradient simulation: 16%*
- Weight: 50.7 lb (23 kg)
- Flywheel: 12.57 lb (5.7 kg)
- Connectivity: ANT+, ANT+ FE-C, Bluetooth
- Power required: Yes
*ThinkRider is often rightly criticized for misleading information. These values are from their thinkrider.eu website. However, manuals and their boxes show different values (2500 W and 20 %), which do not correspond to reality.
Unboxing & Ease of Setup
The package includes:
- The ThinkRIder X7 PRO trainer
- Charging cable
- ANT+ receiver
- Multiple spacers
- Manual
The setup of the X7 PRO was easy. I only had to unfold the legs, mount the cassette, choose the correct adaptors, and plug it into electricity.
I find the carry handle useful because I don’t have a permanent place for my trainer, and I often need to relocate it.
Additionally, it doesn’t take up too much space with folded legs.
Ride Impressions
One of the most underrated features of the X7 PRO trainer is the 5° side-to-side tilt. It eases the pressure on intimate parties, making the indoor ride more comfortable.
The effect is not as significant as when using a rocker plate, but it helps. This is because when the saddle is fixed, the side-to-side motion of our pelvis creates friction and discomfort (you can learn more about this phenomenon in my article on the benefits of rocker plates).
I enjoy the tilt, and the indoor rides are significantly more comfortable than on a solid trainer like Saris H3, which doesn’t offer tilt.
But it takes some time to get used to it, especially when riding out of the saddle.
The X7 PRO reacts quickly to gradient changes in third-party apps. I tested this in Wahoo RGT on their punchy Pienza course. It includes descents and steep climbs in quick succession, so it’s perfect for this test. But more about this later.
ThinkRider X7 PRO Accuracy Tests
I double-checked the X7 PRO power and cadence accuracy with my Favero Assioma DUO pedals (I use them as a benchmark for most smart trainer and power meter tests) and Magene P505 spider power meter.
I also tested its ERG mode, responsivity, and road feel in multiple indoor cycling apps.
NOTE: ThinkRider recommends doing a spindown calibration by following the instructions in their official video. I tried to follow this procedure. However, the app didn’t show any calibration results when I stopped pedaling. This improved with future software updates. But it still doesn’t work flawlessly.
Test #1: ERG Mode
This ERG mode test is the benchmark test I use for all smart bike trainers. It has a short warm-up, ramp-up, multiple 30×30s high/low power intervals, and cool down.
The following picture shows a pretty accurate power line (the yellow one), so everything seems perfect…
X7 PRO reacted to the power changes about 2 seconds in advance, and the resistance change felt more aggressive than Saris H3.
However, it reduces the resistance ~2 seconds before the interval ends. So, it seems there is some shift.
I also felt the power was not quite right during the test. So, I compared X7 PRO power data with other sources that confirmed my assumptions.
Surprisingly, there were no cadence issues.
The dataset is available here.
Test #2: Freeride
I was curious to see my freeride’s power and cadence results on the Pienza course in Wahoo RGT.
It’s a punchy course in Italian Tuscany, so it’s suitable for testing the responsiveness of the trainer.
The freeride felt fine. X7 PRO changed the resistance based on the terrain, and I noticed no issues.
But, when I compared its cadence data with other sources, I noticed one spike and one drop in the beginning.
You can again see the entire dataset.
Test #3: Race
For the last test, I joined a Zwift race.
The X7’s power chart shows a few spikes and drops, and compared to the other two sources, it’s much more volatile.
However, the average power is pretty accurate (+1.08% compared to Assiomas).
The trainer also struggled with cadence, which was delayed by about 4 seconds. But again, the average cadence was accurate.
Here is the link to the dataset.
ThinkRider X7 PRO Alternatives
Here are some of the ThinkRider X7 PRO alternatives worth considering.
- Saris H3 (read my Saris H3 review for more info)
- Elite Direto XR (read my Elite Direto XR review for more info)
- Wahoo KICKR Core
My Verdict
The road feel of the X7 PRO is fine because it reacts quickly to gradient changes and provides enough resistance.
However, gradients above 12% don’t feel more difficult, so it seems there are some issues simulating them.
I like the 5° side-to-side tilt that improves the riding comfort (I didn’t experience as much discomfort as on Saris H3, for example) and the carry handle for easy portability.
Unfortunately, my testing revealed power accuracy issues. The trainer spikes, so the minimum and maximum power are not accurate. But, surprisingly, the average power is relatively accurate.
The way around this would be to use your power meter as a primary source. But for this price, I think you expect more than that.
Additionally, you may encounter issues with eventual claims due to the lack of distributors’ network and non-native English-speaking customer support.
To wrap it up, I would probably stick with more established alternatives like Saris H3, Wahoo KICKR Core, or Elite Direto XR.
X7 PRO has some potential. But ThinkRider has to fix the accuracy issues.
Also available at thinkrider.eu
ThinkRider X7 PRO FAQ
The product for this review was kindly provided by the manufacturer. This did not influence my overall verdict or my opinion about the product. You can learn more about how I approach reviews here.
