MyWhoosh vs. Zwift: Which Is Better? (2026)

Cyclists Hub is supported by its readers. We may receive a commission if you buy products using our links.
All content on Cyclists Hub is written by humans, not robots. Learn More

This comparison of MyWhoosh vs. Zwift summarizes my experience with both apps. I’ve found their pros and cons, so you can decide which is better for you and for reaching your fitness goals.

MyWhoosh vs. Zwift Summary

The following table summarizes the essential features of these apps.

Zwift vs. MyWhoosh: Features Comparison

Let’s now dive deeper into the individual features of Zwift and MyWhoosh.

Virtual Worlds

For many people, graphics are among the most crucial factors when choosing an indoor cycling app, and I am no exception. However, there are fewer graphical differences between MyWhoosh and Zwift than between Zwift and TrainingPeaks Virtual.

MyWhoosh offers multiple virtual worlds, including MyWhoosh World, Switzerland, California, Hudayriyat, Arabia, Colombia, Australia, Alula, and more, which rotate on a set schedule. This rotation creates the impression of a more active user base, but the limited selection of worlds could make routes feel repetitive over time. It’s worth noting that MyWhoosh adopted this system after initially keeping all worlds open—similar to Zwift’s approach, which does this for the same reason.

Zwift also features multiple virtual worlds, including Watopia, London, Paris, Richmond, and others. At any given time, only three worlds are available: Watopia, which is permanently open, and two others that rotate on a schedule. Like MyWhoosh, this system makes the routes appear more populated, but it can lead to a sense of repetition over time. Additionally, the visual experience in both platforms feels quite similar.

In my opinion, Zwift worlds like Neokyo and New York are more engaging because of their futuristic design. I’m not particularly drawn to the Arab-themed worlds. It’s a bit disappointing that these platforms haven’t invested more in creating hyper-futuristic worlds, as this could be an area where they truly differentiate themselves.

Another difference I noticed is the avatars’ movement, which isn’t very realistic in either app. In Zwift, the avatars remain relatively static, while in MyWhoosh, they mimic Tadej Pogačar’s riding style when out of the saddle. Although his unique style looks cool in real life, in MyWhoosh, the avatars wiggle like earthworms.

Winner: It’s a draw

Multiplayer & Social Interactivity

Both apps offer multiplayer features, gestures, and chat options, enabling you to connect with other riders and organize group rides. Additionally, they provide dedicated companion apps—Zwift Companion and MyWhoosh Link—that enhance functionality.

Zwift routes benefit from a larger community (thousands of people online) and a smaller selection of routes, ensuring you almost always encounter other riders. This strong sense of community is where Zwift currently excels. While MyWhoosh is growing in popularity, you’re less likely to see as many real riders (hundreds to thousands) and may come across more bots.

The companion apps further enrich the experience by allowing you to chat with others, give kudos, and search for events or clubs, making the overall experience smoother and more engaging.

Winner: Zwift

TIP: Are you tired of your static indoor training? Check out my article on rocker plates that can make your indoor cycling experience more comfortable and engaging.

Races & Events

Both Zwift and MyWhoosh allow racing and hosting events. However, its large community and growing user base make Zwift races more frequent and popular. Dozens of races are held daily. MyWhoosh tries hard to catch up (it hosted the 2024 and 2025 UCI Esports Cycling World Championships and will host them again in 2026), but races there are not as frequent.

On the other hand, MyWhoosh offers races with real cash prizes for both amateurs and professionals. This is a unique selling point that sets it apart from every other indoor cycling app. While entry requirements are strict (often mandating dual recording or specific equipment/weight verification), the opportunity to earn money through series like the Sunday Race Club makes it the premier destination for competitive esports racers.

Winner: Zwift

Workouts

Both MyWhoosh and Zwift are well-suited to structured training. In MyWhoosh, you can browse workouts (and training plans) and filter them by difficulty, duration, and other criteria. The app also features a workout builder that lets you create custom workouts or upload your own from platforms like TrainingPeaks. Additionally, MyWhoosh offers “controllable companion bots,” virtual pace partners designed to help you stay motivated and maintain your tempo.

Zwift has a similarly comprehensive selection of structured workouts and plans. As in MyWhoosh, you can create using the workout builder or upload them. You can also leverage pace partners.

Winner: It’s a draw

PRO TIP: Use a fan while training indoors to stay cool and comfortable during your workouts.

Gamification

Zwift and MyWhoosh have embraced gamification, but it’s important to note that Zwift set a high standard early on, with many of its concepts influencing other platforms like MyWhoosh.

Zwift stands out as a game-like experience, incorporating numerous gamification elements to enhance motivation for indoor training. These include collecting drops, achieving goals, completing routes, and upgrading equipment. They also have challenges that unlock unique equipment like the Zwift Tron bike.

While MyWhoosh initially lacked as many gamification elements, it has gradually added more over time. Instead of drops, you collect coins, which can be used to purchase new equipment. Unlike Zwift, however, MyWhoosh allows users to buy these coins with real money—one of the platform’s monetization strategies.

The Awards and Achievements section is not as extensive as in Zwift, but they had to start somewhere. When I tested MyWhoosh in 2023, this section didn’t even exist.

There are also various challenges where you can earn season points and unlock additional rewards. The system is comprehensive, incorporating three currencies: coins, power gems, and season points. However, this mix can be confusing. It’s unclear whether this complexity is intentional—perhaps to obscure the real-money cost of individual items—or simply a result of poor design.

One difference worth noting is the absence of power-ups in MyWhoosh. Zwift’s power-ups are a clever way to make the experience more entertaining and engaging.

Winner: It’s a draw

User Friendliness

MyWhoosh and Zwift are both user-friendly, but I prefer MyWhoosh. It’s more responsive, easier to navigate, and loads quickly. It provides the essential information you need without any unnecessary extras.

Zwift underwent a redesign in 2022, which improved its user-friendliness by removing confusing buttons and making it feel more intuitive. However, it remains a bit too laggy and clunky for my taste.

Winner: MyWhoosh

Platforms Availability and Connectivity

MyWhoosh and Zwift are available on all major platforms, including iOS, Android, macOS, Windows, and Apple TV.

Both apps also support virtual shifting. Zwift was first to introduce this feature, but MyWhoosh followed in the March 2025 update that introduced the MyShift. However, Zwift still has better hardware integration (especially thanks to the Zwift Click, Zwift Play, and Zwift Cog).

Before committing, I recommend checking the list of devices compatible with MyWhoosh, as some users reported issues with less-known trainers.

Winner: It’s a draw

Total Score: MyWhoosh (1), Zwift (2), It’s a draw (4)

Pricing

Zwift costs $19.99 per month or $199.99 per year, while MyWhoosh is free. If the social aspect isn’t your priority, MyWhoosh offers better value. However, if you enjoy frequent events and interacting with people worldwide, the monthly fee can be worth it.

Updated on 12th of February, 2026

MyWhoosh and Zwift Alternatives

For those looking for indoor cycling apps similar to MyWhoosh and Zwift, TrainingPeaks Virtual (formerly Indievelo) is the closest option. It also uses a virtual world but features more realistic graphics.

The following table summarizes all the indoor cycling apps I tested and my scoring.

The Winner

Price-wise, MyWhoosh offers unbeatable value because it is entirely free, and with its cash-prize races, it can even pay you. However, Zwift remains the king of community engagement and variety of events. Ultimately, your choice depends on your goals.

If you are focused on structured training, need a free platform, or want to mix cycling with rowing and running, MyWhoosh is the superior option. But if you prioritize a massive social community, frequent races every hour, and deep gamification, Zwift is worth the monthly fee.

My Zwift rating at a glance:
Ease of Setup 5/5 | Engagement 5/5 | Community 5/5 | Routes 3/5 | Training 4/5 | UX 3/5 | Platforms Availability 5/5 | Price 3/5 | OVERALL 4.1/5

My MyWhoosh rating at a glance:
Ease of Setup 5/5 | Engagement 4/5 | Community 3/5 | Routes 3/5 | Training 3/5 | UX 4/5 | Platforms Availability 5/5 | Price 5/5 | OVERALL 4.0/5
More about this indoor cycling apps scoring.

I recommend trying both apps to see which one suits you better.

MyWhoosh vs. Zwift: FAQ