FulGaz Review: Ride and Enjoy Worldwide Routes in High-Quality (2021)

FulGaz Review: Screenshot from my ride put into MacBook Pro mockup

FulGaz is an indoor cycling app with a rich collection of high-quality footage from all over the world. The question is, is it worth it?

In this FulGaz review, you learn what its pros & cons are, how it stands out compared to its alternatives, and more.

Let’s dive in.

FulGaz Summary


  • A comprehensive library of high-quality real-world routes
  • Nice, crisp, and undisturbed riding experience
  • Includes structured workouts and training plans
  • Allows hosting group rides & races
  • Suitable for riders who want to tweak settings like drag coefficient, rolling resistance, etc.


  • Not a very sophisticated motivational system
  • No avatars (can be an advantage for some people)
  • No drafting, power-ups, etc.
  • Workouts and training plans library is narrow
  • Possible compatibility issues with ‘older’ operating systems
  • Laggy user interface

What is FulGaz?
FulGaz is an Australian indoor cycling app with a rich library of pre-recorded high-quality footage from all parts of the world. You can create (or join) group rides, races, ride solo, or follow structured workouts.

Who is it for?
FulGaz is perfect for people who want to visit beautiful places from the comfort of their homes. Thanks to the high-quality video, you will almost feel like you were riding outside.

Who is it not for?
FulGaz is not for performance-oriented riders because it is not focused mainly on improving your performance. Additionally, you need to be motivated because FulGaz doesn’t leverage many motivation mechanisms.

My Experience with FulGaz

Here is my experience with the initial setup, routes, user experience, and more you can find in FulGaz.

Initial Setup

Pairing my smart trainer (Elite Direto 2) and HR monitor (Wahoo TICKR) with FulGaz was as easy as with other indoor cycling apps I tested.

However, for some reason, the app duplicated my devices in the menu. Check out the following picture.

FulGaz (duplicated) Paired Devices
FulGaz Paired Devices

If you don’t have a smart trainer, don’t worry. You don’t need it for using FulGaz. But you need a speed sensor so that FulGaz can calculate your power. A cadence sensor is optional and cannot be used on its own.

INDOOR CYCLING TIP: Improve your comfort and engagement with a cycling rocker plate and its swinging motion. I also recommend buying an indoor cycling fan that will keep you cooled down.

In-App Experience

FulGaz is known for its rich library of routes from all parts of the world. Anybody can become a contributor and start uploading their routes.

Not every route is approved, though, because the FulGaz team has pretty high-quality standards, so users get the best routes possible.

After launching the app, you will see this easy-to-navigate dashboard.

FulGaz App Dashboard (trending routes, programs, favorite routes, etc.)
FulGaz Dashboard

You can sort routes by A-Z, date, distance, elevation, and toughness. Unfortunately, the app doesn’t have any filter to make browsing and choosing the desired route easier.

Before you start riding, I recommend checking out the settings. This is where FulGaz has an advantage compared to other indoor apps.

It allows you to set standard features like video quality as well as aerodynamic drag, rolling resistance, or wind speed.

I also prefer the ‘HUD display’ settings. The ‘bike computer’ is pretty small, so the ride data are hard to ready, and when you set it to a large size, it takes up too much screen.

FulGaz HUD Display ride view
FulGaz HUD Display
FulGaz Bike Computer Display ride view
FulGaz Bike Computer Display

You can also choose between three modes in settings. Unfortunately, they are not explained in the app, so here is their brief description:

  1. Steady Mode – locks the ride at the same speed it was filmed. This is the best mode if you choose a route based on its duration. All workouts are locked into this mode.
  2. Reactive Mode – reacts on your power. So, if you slow down, the video will slow down. All group rides are ‘locked’ into this mode.
  3. Challenge Mode – is the same as reactive, but you can choose a result of a previous rider to race against.

The steady mode is ideal if you know what time for the training you have. You can choose a route based on its duration, and don’t worry about a slower tempo.

However, use the reactive mode instead if you want to leverage your smart bike trainer features (like the resistance adjustments).

Speaking of resistance adjustments, they felt pretty sudden. For example, Zwift felt much smoother.

FulGaz, unlike ROUVY, Wahoo RGT, or Zwift, doesn’t feature drafting or power-ups. This means that the ride feels more challenging than these apps.

So, be prepared to do the hard work. As in other apps, FUlGaz also allows you to change the trainer’s difficulty to make steep climbs feel easier.


FulGaz doesn’t include a very sophisticated motivation system, but you can join challenges against others. You simply choose a route, turn on the Challenge Mode, and start riding. Your goal is to beat the best time.

Better engagement is an area where FulGaz can improve. Except for the beautiful routes, there are not many things that would keep me engaged.

For example, apps like TrainerRoad or SYSTM don’t leverage as many gamification elements as Zwift. These apps are designed to improve your performance. People use them because they want to get better.

Additionally, they include at least achievements or other rewards. You won’t find these things in FulGaz.

Zwift is a pioneer in indoor cycling apps gamification. It has the most sophisticated gamification of all apps.


One of the things I like the most about FulGaz is its online route library. You can easily browse hundreds of routes and choose the one you want.

If you don’t pick any route, you can become a FulGaz contributor. Although FulGaz won’t accept every footage due to their high standards, you can try to apply.

I think it is great that they don’t accept every route because there is much work behind the scenes. Additionally, they can keep the riding experience high.

Did you know that FulGaz engineers have to spend 8-10 hours on every hour of footage?

FulGaz Properly Loaded Route Library
FulGaz Route Library

The only thing I miss in the routes library is a filter. Simple sorting doesn’t help me find the best route for a given situation.


FulGaz has a workout library. It includes dozens of workouts and a few structured plans. However, this is an area where FulGaz can improve because the offer is pretty narrow compared to FulGaz’s closest alternative – ROUVY.

FulGaz Workouts Library (FTP test, interval workouts)
FulGaz Workouts Library

ROUVY is the most similar app to FulGaz because it also uses real-world footage, but unlike FulGaz, it augments it with virtual objects.

If you look for more training-oriented apps, check out TrainerRoad or Wahoo SYSTM. They feature more sophisticated and personalized plans based on your strengths & weaknesses.

I tried a few FulGaz workouts, and I like how clean the interface looks. It includes only the info you need for your training, and the rest of the screen is used for the footage.

User Friendliness

FulGaz is perfect for advanced users because it allows them to adjust multiple settings, including aerodynamic drag, rolling resistance, ERG mode reaction time, and many more.

I also like the cleanliness and minimalistic interface that don’t disturb the riding experience.

Unlike ROUVY, the routes were working and were stable without the need to download them in advance.

Unfortunately, that’s where the positives end and the negatives start. I encountered multiple issues.

NOTE: It is possible that the following issues were caused by my operating system. Although I believe the app should work on ‘older’ OS, I plan to give FulGaz a second chance once I upgrade to the newest macOS and update this review. Other indoor cycling apps I tested didn’t require the latest OS.

1. After setting the units to ‘Metric,’ the app menu showed my weight and other details in ‘Imperial’ units.

2. FulGaz interface didn’t feel responsive, especially when clicking the return arrow in the menu.

3. When I wanted to browse the routes library, the app showed a few route names and then froze (see the picture below). I had to restart the app and wait for the routes to load (I am using a 25 Mbit/s connection). This error is probably caused by a large number of available routes. The grid is also very dense, making the routes’ details hard to read.

FulGaz Wrongly Loaded Route Library
FulGaz Unloaded Route Library
FulGaz Wrongly Loaded Route Detail
FulGaz Unloaded Route Detail

4. When I tried to download routes, the download didn’t start. I found out that this issue was caused by the connected trainer. Once I disconnected it from a power source, the download started again.

FulGaz Download Error
FulGaz Download Error

5. The app crashed multiple times during my testing, so I contacted the FulGaz team for assistance. After a few emails, they asked me to upgrade to the newest macOS Monterey (I tested FulGaz on macOS Big Sur). According to them, an upgrade should solve these issues.
However, I didn’t plan to upgrade my OS when writing this review. I tested all other indoor cycling apps with this version of macOS, and I didn’t encounter these issues.

Platforms Availability

FulGaz is available on all major platforms, including iOS, Android, macOS, Windows, and Apple TV.

FulGaz platforms availability (iOS, macOS, Windows, Android, Apple TV)
FulGaz platforms availability

As mentioned in summary, you may encounter issues if you don’t run the latest operating system.

Although it is not guaranteed that my operating system caused the issues I encountered, so far, it seems like the most likely cause (read the more in-depth explanation here).

FulGaz Alternatives

There are plenty of indoor cycling apps out there, but only a few of them are worth it. The following ones are my favorite.

  • TrainerRoad – is a fully performance-oriented cycling app with comprehensive workouts library. It only shows you your ride data, no virtual world or video footage.
  • Zwift – utilizes virtual world built from scratch. It doesn’t have as wide a route library as ROUVY. It is much closer to being a game.
  • ROUVY – is the closest alternative to FulGaz. It also uses real-world footage, but ROUVY augments it with avatars and other objects. It has a huge route library and allows you to explore beautiful places from the comfort of your home.
  • Wahoo SYSTM – includes traditional cycling training, yoga for cyclists, strength and mental training to make you a better, faster, and more resilient cyclist.
  • Wahoo RGT (formerly known as RGT Cycling) – features a virtual world inspired by real-world roads. Its graphics is more realistic than Zwift, but it doesn’t offer as sophisticated motivation mechanisms.
AppPriceFree TrialWorldMultiplayerConnectivityPlatform Availability
Zwift14.99 USD / month7 daysVirtualYesANT+ FE-C, Bluetooth, BLE FTMSAndroid, iOS, Windows, macOS, Apple TV
ROUVY12 USD / month
144 USD / year
14 daysRealYesANT+ FE-C, BluetoothAndroid, iOS, Windows, macOS, Apple TV
TrainerRoad19.95 USD / month
189 USD / year
n/a**n/aNoANT+ FE-C, Bluetooth, BLE FTMSAndroid, iOS, Windows, macOS
Wahoo SYSTM (formerly The Sufferfest)*14.99 USD / month
129 USD / year
14 daysRealNoANT+ FE-C, BLE FTMSAndroid, iOS, Windows, macOS
Wahoo RGT (formerly RGT Cycling)*Free or
14.99 USD / month
129 USD / year
14 daysVirtualYesANT+ FE-C, BLE FTMSAndroid, iOS (remote)
Windows, macOS, Apple TV (screen)
FulGaz12.99 USD / month
108.99 USD / year
14 daysRealYesANT+ FE-C, BLE FTMSAndroid, iOS, Windows, macOS, Apple TV
List of the best indoor cycling apps with the info about their price, free trial period, type of the world, multiplayer option, connectivity, and platform availability.
Updated on the 10th of April, 2022.
*You can only subscribe to the Wahoo X subscription and get access to Wahoo SYSTM and Wahoo RGT.
**30-day money-back guarantee

I created a rating system for evaluating the following features. It helps to keep the comparison between training apps consistent.

  • Price – how expensive is the app relative to other indoor cycling apps?
  • Ease of setup – is the app easy to set up with a smart trainer? Can it be used without it?
  • Engagement – does the app keep you engaged and motivated?
  • Routes – does the app offer a wide route library?
  • Training – does the app include prebuilt workout plans? Do they help you get faster?
  • User-friendliness and intuitiveness (UX) – is the app easy to navigate, easy to use, clear, and intuitive?
  • Platform availability – is the app available for multiple platforms like iOS, Android, Windows, macOS, AppleTV, etc.?

The following table shows my ratings of specific areas on a scale of 1–5 (5 is the best).

AppPriceEase of SetupEngage-
RoutesTrainingUXPlatforms AvailabilityTotal
Wahoo SYSTM354355429
Wahoo RGT (RGT Cycling)552242323
My indoor cycling apps rating on a scale of 1–5 (5 is the best)
*TrainerRoad is different from other apps and doesn't offer any routes.

FulGaz FAQ

My Verdict

Disclaimer: When testing FulGaz, I experienced issues that are not common among most users. I plan to return to this app once I upgrade my operating system and update this review.

Do I recommend FulGaz? Yes. If you want to “visit” new places from the comfort of your home and enjoy high-quality footage, FulGaz is perfect for you. I can guarantee you that you won’t be able to try all routes because their library is enormous.

Do I recommend it to everybody? No. FulGaz is not for people who lack motivation because it doesn’t include any motivation system like Zwift. It is also not suitable for performance-oriented riders because its pre-build workouts are not the best quality and apps like TrainerRoad or SYSTM are on another level.

About The Author

4 thoughts on “FulGaz Review: Ride and Enjoy Worldwide Routes in High-Quality (2021)”

  1. I’ve been using Fulgaz for 3 years now, as it’s the only app presenting a “realistic” video world, am principally interested in “touring the world” on my stationary bike, so I don’t get bored staring at walls from the days of dumb trainers. Pros, Fulgaz has come a long way, supporting many popular hardware platforms, many customized settings. Cons, never got over the limitation of AppleTV only using 2 Bluetooth channels and choppy video play during reactive/challenge modes. No, I shall not use the Steady mode ‘cuz the point of these smart trainers is, to simulate real-world feel as much as possible, as in VR.

    I’ve seen buggy software releases but usually, just send them an email of what the problem is and if obvious, they will fix it, but am not a fan of responses from their Q&A, basically saying if your arm hurt, don’t move it that way solutions, and no comments allowed. Hope the new owner is more receptive to suggestions. Hoping this app gets more popular where users can go back& forth but I haven’t found such a forum yet. We should be exchanging tips and the most gorgeous rides ever, thumbs up Zion Tunnel and Sydney Harbor, do it on your 4K big screen 🙂

    1. Hello John,
      Thank you for your beautiful insight! I hope you liked my review.

      Have a nice day, and I wish you a lot more kilometers on Fulgaz, or even better, outside.

      – Petr

  2. Petr, a nice detailed review! Thank you for putting it together! I tried FulGaz on Windows, and it turned out to be a total disaster. I’ve been using Zwift, Rouvy since Covid started, and became a BigRingVR user lately, as well. I wiped FulGaz off my computer after two hours of trying! The Windows version was totally unstable a year ago, and it remains extremely buggy now, in its new version. Many of the issues which you highlighted for MacOS are also present in the Windows version, and there are more issues than you listed – e.g., poor synchronization of trainer resistance and road profile in the video, drops in resistance, errors in communicated slope to the trainer, crashes of the application, incorrectly functioning map. I heard, both from FulGaz directly and from other people that iOS version is stable and reliable, although did not test it myself. Your report suggests that MacOS version is better than Windows version, but might still be worse than their original iOS version. I suppose, your recommendation should have a disclaimer that you only tried it on an Apple device. For those of us who use Windows, it is nothing short of disaster, so poorly it is programmed. I would rank it zero stars out of five, for Windows.

    1. Hi Andrei,
      I apologize for approving your comment so late, the system marked it as spam. Thank you for sharing your experience. I mention that I tested it on macOS in the “User Friendliness” section. 🙂
      Hopefully, they will fix the major issues in the future. The app has potential.
      – Petr

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Scroll to Top